|
TTUTAs
POSITION ON RESTRUCTURING & DECENTRALIZATION (RD)
In 2000,
at a consultation on the MOEs plans to restructure the education system,
TTUTA had recommended that first consideration ought to be given to
enhancing the eight (8) Education Districts. Given that there already
exist these structures, it seems logical that this option is the most
viable since it takes into account the cost implications, a smooth transition
and effective service and delivery.
In 2003,
with the issues once again up for national debate, the MOE has defined
five (5) possible options. The Association maintains its recommendation
for the strengthening and enhancement of the present structures. However,
to ensure that no new problems are created and to prevent a bottleneck
of issues to be resolved at the District Offices, the Association strongly
urges that:
These
District offices be adequately funded/resourced at all times;
In
the decentralized units, care must be taken to ensure that the disparate
units do not all function as separate entities. There must be some level
of cohesiveness and basic minimum standards amongst all the Districts;
Delinking
and unification ought to go hand in hand with the process with the relevant
amendments to the Teaching Service Commission regulations;
The
necessary checks and balances must be instituted to ensure that the
offices are allowed to function effectively and smoothly, with an appropriate
degree of autonomy;
The
criteria for determining the establishment of these District offices
ought to be developed and worked on in a timely fashion;
Movement
of teachers ought not to be restricted within the Districts. Provision
must be made which will allow teachers to move not only to schools within
the District - but also from one District to another.
The
shift in giving schools more autonomy ought not to result in overburdening
administrators with so many administrative duties such that it distracts
from the management of the individual schools;
In
the devolution of power and authority to school administrators, their
agreed upon job descriptions must be borne in mind and not infringed.
FUNCTIONS OF THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM
i)
School Supervision:
This
is best suited at the district level but specific functions at MOEs
Head Office (HO)
ii)
Curriculum:
Design
and development at the national level yet allowing schools to adapt
the curriculum to satisfy relevance and needs of the community.
Implementation
at the District and school level
Evaluation
at all levels
iii)
Technical and Vocational Education:
Design
and implementation National/District Level
Implementation
at the National, District and school levels
Evaluation
National, District and school
iv)
Human Resources:
Planning
National and District Level
Recruiting
& Staffing National Level
Registration
District Level
Training
National & District Levels
Pension
& Leave National and District Level Specific issues of pension at
the District Level Specific issues of leave at the National, District
and school levels.
v)
Educational Planning
Plan
Proposals and Programming National and District Levels
Project
Preparation Implementation and Evaluation National and District Levels
Policy
Analysis, Statistics National Level
Research
Outsourced
vi)
Educational Research and Evaluation:
Testing
and Assessment National and District Levels (can also be outsourced)
Research
National Level (can also be outsourced)
Evaluation
National Level or also outsourced
vii)
Educational Services:
Examination
National or outsourced
School
Broadcasting National or outsourced
Education
Television National or outsourced
Publications
National or outsourced
Materials
Development National or outsourced
Adult
Education National or outsourced
Continuing
Education National or outsourced
School
Libraries National, District or outsourced
viii)
National Examination Council:
At
the National Level
ix)
Finance and Accounts:
Paysheets
National and District
Check
staff National and District
Accounts
National and District
Tenders
and Contracts National Level
x)
General Administration:
Registry
National and District
Stores
National and District
Machine
Room Operations National and District
Messenger
and Maid Service National and District
Janitorial
and Handyman Services National and District
Administrative
Services National and District
Security
National
xi)
Communication:
National
and District Level
xii)
IT:
National,
District and School Levels
xiii)
Legal Services:
National
and District
xiv)
Internal Audit:
National
and District
xv)
Educational Facilities Management Division:
National,
District or outsourced
xvi)
Office of the CEO National
UNESCO National
SEMPCU National
EPCU National
RCLRC National
July 2003
APPENDIX II SCHOOL:
Curriculum
Implementation
Curriculum
Evaluation
Leave
DISTRICT:
Entities
of School Supervision
Curriculum
Implementation
Curriculum
Evaluation
Entities
of Human Resources
Educational
Planning, Proposals and Programming
Project
preparation, Implementation & Evaluation
Testing
& Assessment
School
Libraries
Finance
& Accounts
General
Administration
IT
Legal
Services
Internal
Audit
Educational
Facilities Management Division (EFMD)
HEAD
OFFICE:
Entities
of School Supervision
Curriculum
Design & Implementation
Curriculum
Evaluation
All
entities of HR
Educational
plans, proposals & programming
Project
preparation, Implementation & Evaluation
Education
Policy Analysis, Statistics & Research
All
entities of Educational Research & Evaluation
All
entities of Educational Services
All
entities of Finance & Accounts
All
entities of General Administration
Communications
IT
Legal
Services
Internal
Audit
EFMD
Office
of he CEO; UNESCO; SEMPCU; EPCU; RCLRC
Recommendations of the Central Education Committee
Adapted by the General Council in June 2003.
|